Tennessee Watauga District Land
Sep 10, 2026
Watauga District Land Judging
Overall

ID: 100.01 - 1 -
Team Name: HAMPTON
Participant Name:
GEORGIA SHEL BY
Individual Rank: 26
Individual Total Score: 208
Team Rank: 15
Team Total Score: 549
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Sloping
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
18
Part 1 Total
107
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
High
High
Low
Medium
Class VI
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Medium
Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 Total
39
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 Total
34
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 Total
28
Field 1 Total
66
Field 2 Total
45
Field 3 Total
55
Field 4 Total
42


AWS100: Thursday, September 24, 2026