CASH R OYSTON - HAMPTON - Watauga District Land Judging - Tennessee Watauga District Land

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

Tennessee Watauga District Land
Sep 10, 2026
Watauga District Land Judging

Overall

ID:	100.03 - 3 -
Team Name:	HAMPTON
Participant Name:	CASH R OYSTON
Individual Rank:	90
Individual Total Score:	141
Team Rank:	19
Team Total Score:	528
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Part 1 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Shallow None or few Moderately well-drained Common High Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep None or few Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Shallow None or few Well-drained Common High Gently sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Medium Deep None or few Moderately well-drained None or few High Moderately steep None to slight Footslope

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fine Medium Moderately deep None or few Well-drained Common Low Very Steep Moderate Footslope	Medium Medium Deep None or few Moderately well-drained None or few High Steep None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fine Fine Deep None or few Excessively drained Common Medium Moderately steep None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Steep None to slight Footslope

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 Total

Part 2 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Low High High High High High High Medium Low	Class III No Yes No No Yes No No No Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class V No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Medium High High High High High High Medium Low	Class IV Yes Yes No No No No No No Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Low Low High High High High High Medium Low	Class VI Yes Yes No No No No No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class V Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Medium High High High High High High High Low	Class VI No Yes No No No No No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 Total

Part 3 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with grass/legume No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes	Annual crops with grass/legume No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No	Annual crops with grass/legume No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Grass/legume cover No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with minimal conservation No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 Total

Part 4 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Poor Fair Good Good Fair Good	Good Good Good Good Fair Good Fair

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Poor Good Good Good Fair Good	Fair Good Good Fair Good Good Fair

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Poor Fair Poor Fair Fair Fair	Fair Good Good Poor Good Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Poor Good Good Fair Good Good	Good Good Good Poor Good Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 Total

Field 1 Total

Field 2 Total

Field 3 Total

Field 4 Total

AWS100: Thursday, September 24, 2026