Tennessee Watauga District Land
Sep 10, 2026
Watauga District Land Judging
Overall

ID: 100.02 - 2 -
Team Name: HAMPTON
Participant Name:
LAUREN SMITH
Individual Rank: 66
Individual Total Score: 167
Team Rank: 18
Team Total Score: 529
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
12
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
18
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
9
Part 1 Total
74
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Low
Class VI
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 Total
38
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 Total
17
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
38
Field 1 Total
58
Field 2 Total
30
Field 3 Total
44
Field 4 Total
35


AWS100: Thursday, September 24, 2026