West Tennessee Soil Judging Clinic
Sep 17, 2026
West TN Soil Judging Clinic
Overall

ID: 23.01 - 1 -
Team Name: Brighton
Participant Name:
APFEL WYATT
Individual Rank: 86
Individual Total Score: 220
Team Rank: 19
Team Total Score: 686
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
Common
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Severe
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 Total
100
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
High
Low
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
High
Low
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
51
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 Total
33
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 Total
36
Field 1 Total
45
Field 2 Total
76
Field 3 Total
34
Field 4 Total
65


AWS100: Thursday, September 24, 2026