West Tennessee Soil Judging Clinic
Sep 17, 2026
West TN Soil Judging Clinic
Overall

ID: 52.05 - 5 -
Team Name: COVINGTON
Participant Name:
TAYLOR SANDERS
Individual Rank: 64
Individual Total Score: 243
Team Rank: 21
Team Total Score: 679
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Severe
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
31
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
31
Part 1 Total
108
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 Total
44
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 Total
41
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
50
Field 1 Total
58
Field 2 Total
58
Field 3 Total
58
Field 4 Total
69


AWS100: Thursday, September 24, 2026