Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 629 - -
Team Name: Wilson Central F
Participant Name:
BRAY* GONZALEZ
Individual Rank: 35
Individual Total Score: 254
Team Rank: 17
Team Total Score: 661
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
31
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
Common
Low
Sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
15
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
41
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Common
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
38
Part 1 Total
125
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
High
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
60
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 Total
23
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
46
Field 1 Total
56
Field 2 Total
41
Field 3 Total
88
Field 4 Total
69


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026