Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 602 - -
Team Name: Watertown B
Participant Name:
EZEKIEL FRIZZELL
Individual Rank: 1
Individual Total Score: 349
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 932
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
43
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
43
Part 1 Total
158
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
21
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
22
Part 2 Total
82
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
59
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
50
Field 1 Total
90
Field 2 Total
74
Field 3 Total
97
Field 4 Total
88


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026