Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 624 - -
Team Name: Wilson Central A
Participant Name:
WYATT ERWIN
Individual Rank: 25
Individual Total Score: 268
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 836
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
42
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Common
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
44
Part 1 Total
155
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 Total
51
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
28
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
34
Field 1 Total
59
Field 2 Total
62
Field 3 Total
87
Field 4 Total
60


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026