Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 608 - -
Team Name: Watertown H
Participant Name:
DIEGO RESENDIZ
Individual Rank: 77
Individual Total Score: 189
Team Rank: 14
Team Total Score: 693
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
Common
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
Severe
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Many
Low
Moderately steep
Severe
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
36
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
Common
Poorly-drained
Many
Low
Sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
16
Part 1 Total
101
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
4
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VII
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
43
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 Total
25
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
20
Field 1 Total
37
Field 2 Total
43
Field 3 Total
57
Field 4 Total
52


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026