Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 627 - -
Team Name: Wilson Central D
Participant Name:
JOSEPH HARKREADER
Individual Rank: 84
Individual Total Score: 182
Team Rank: 23
Team Total Score: 566
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
13
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Nearly level
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 Total
78
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
High
Medium
High
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 Total
49
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Trees
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 Total
23
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 Total
32
Field 1 Total
42
Field 2 Total
38
Field 3 Total
55
Field 4 Total
47


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026