Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 631 - -
Team Name: MTAA Middle- A
Participant Name:
LEVI OZBURN
Individual Rank: 61
Individual Total Score: 214
Team Rank: 24
Team Total Score: 548
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Moderately deep
Common
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 Total
117
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
High
Low
Low
High
Medium
Medium
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
High
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Medium
High
Low
High
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 Total
40
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 Total
35
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
22
Field 1 Total
55
Field 2 Total
59
Field 3 Total
49
Field 4 Total
51


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026