JACOB FARMER - Mt. Juliet A - Wilson County District Soils - Wilson County Land Evaluation

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils

Overall

ID:	622 - -
Team Name:	Mt. Juliet A
Participant Name:	JACOB FARMER
Individual Rank:	57
Individual Total Score:	223
Team Rank:	15
Team Total Score:	679
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Part 1 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained Many Low Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep Many Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Very Shallow None or few Somewhat poorly-drained Many Low Gently sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained Common Low Gently sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Shallow None or few Moderately well-drained None or few Low Nearly level None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Nearly level None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Fine Moderately deep Common Well-drained Common Low Sloping Moderate Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep Many Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 Total

107

Part 2 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Medium Medium High Medium	Class VI No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class III Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Low Low Low Low Low Low Medium Medium High	Class III No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Low Low Low Low Medium Low Medium Medium Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Low Low Low Low Low Low Medium Low Medium	Class I No No No No No No No No High High High High High High High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low Medium High Medium	Class VI No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 Total

Part 3 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No No No No No Yes No No Yes	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No No No No No Yes No No Yes	Annual crops with minimal conservation No No No No No No Yes No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 Total

Part 4 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Good Good Fair Fair Poor Poor	Good Good Good Good Poor Poor Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Poor Good Poor Good Good Good Poor	Good Good Poor Good Poor Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Good Fair Good Good Good Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Fair	Good Good Good Good Poor Poor Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 Total

Field 1 Total

Field 2 Total

Field 3 Total

Field 4 Total

AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026