ROLAND R SPRINGER - Watertown K - Wilson County District Soils - Wilson County Land Evaluation

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils

Overall

ID:	611 - -
Team Name:	Watertown K
Participant Name:	ROLAND R SPRINGER
Individual Rank:	82
Individual Total Score:	184
Team Rank:	13
Team Total Score:	694
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Part 1 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Deep Common Well-drained Many High Gently sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep Many Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Moderately deep None or few Well-drained Many Medium Moderately steep Moderate Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained Common Low Gently sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fine Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Gently sloping Moderate Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Nearly level None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Deep Common Moderately well-drained Common High Sloping Moderate Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep Many Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 Total

Part 2 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Medium Medium Low Low Medium Medium High Low High	Class VI No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class III Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High Low High	Class III No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Low Low Low Low Medium Low Medium Medium Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No High High High High High High High High High	Class I No No No No No No No No High High High High High High High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No High High Medium Medium High Medium High	Class VI No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 Total

Part 3 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with grass/legume No No No No No No No No Yes	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes	Annual crops with minimal conservation No No No No No No Yes No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with grass/legume Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes	Grass/legume cover No No No No No No No No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 Total

Part 4 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Fair Good Poor Fair Poor	Good Good Good Good Poor Poor Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Good Good Good Poor Fair Poor	Good Good Poor Good Poor Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Poor Fair Fair Fair Poor	Good Good Good Good Poor Poor Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 Total

Field 1 Total

Field 2 Total

Field 3 Total

Field 4 Total

AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026