Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 610 - -
Team Name: Watertown J
Participant Name:
ISAAC L MASSEY
Individual Rank: 73
Individual Total Score: 196
Team Rank: 18
Team Total Score: 654
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
33
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Deep
Common
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 Total
112
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 Total
31
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
15
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
38
Field 1 Total
52
Field 2 Total
43
Field 3 Total
56
Field 4 Total
45


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026