Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 619 - -
Team Name: Page Middle B
Participant Name:
KA LYYNN RAMER
Individual Rank: 91
Individual Total Score: 164
Team Rank: 28
Team Total Score: 395
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Poorly-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
16
Part 1 Total
88
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
High
Medium
High
High
Low
High
Low
High
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
High
High
High
High
High
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 Total
24
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 Total
22
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
30
Field 1 Total
42
Field 2 Total
38
Field 3 Total
47
Field 4 Total
37


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026