Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 633 - -
Team Name: MTAA Middle- B
Participant Name:
BRISTOL BARNETT
Individual Rank: 100
Individual Total Score: 147
Team Rank: 26
Team Total Score: 422
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
Many
Moderately well-drained
Many
High
Moderately steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
7
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Shallow
Common
Excessively drained
Common
Medium
Gently sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
8
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Flood Plain
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Shallow
Common
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
20
Part 1 Total
56
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 Total
44
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
11
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
11
Part 3 Total
29
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 Total
18
Field 1 Total
30
Field 2 Total
29
Field 3 Total
38
Field 4 Total
50


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026