Wilson County Land Evaluation
Sep 24, 2026
Wilson County District Soils
Overall

ID: 628 - -
Team Name: Wilson Central E
Participant Name:
AVERY BLAKE
Individual Rank: 34
Individual Total Score: 256
Team Rank: 12
Team Total Score: 729
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Fine
Deep
Common
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Depression
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
14
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Excessively drained
Common
Medium
Gently sloping
Moderate
Flood Plain
Medium
Fine
Deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 Total
108
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 Total
57
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 Total
39
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
52
Field 1 Total
42
Field 2 Total
83
Field 3 Total
89
Field 4 Total
42


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026