Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 366 - -
Team Name: Christian Community White House FFA
Participant Name:
ALLY HINKLE
Individual Rank: 83
Individual Total Score: 243
Team Rank: 27
Team Total Score: 718
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
Common
High
Sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
38
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 Total
109
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 Total
47
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 Total
53
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
34
Field 1 Total
51
Field 2 Total
75
Field 3 Total
62
Field 4 Total
55


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026