Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 32 - -
Team Name: CLAY COUNTY
Participant Name:
ABIGAIL TINSLEY
Individual Rank: 89
Individual Total Score: 239
Team Rank: 18
Team Total Score: 775
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
Common
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 Total
124
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 Total
46
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
25
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
44
Field 1 Total
55
Field 2 Total
67
Field 3 Total
79
Field 4 Total
38


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026