Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 56 - -
Team Name: CULLEOKA
Participant Name:
WYATT ANDERSON
Individual Rank: 81
Individual Total Score: 246
Team Rank: 29
Team Total Score: 656
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 Total
136
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 Total
58
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 Total
30
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
22
Field 1 Total
62
Field 2 Total
60
Field 3 Total
67
Field 4 Total
57


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026