Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 366 - -
Team Name: Christian Community White House FFA
Participant Name:
ANDY SMITH
Individual Rank: 90
Individual Total Score: 238
Team Rank: 27
Team Total Score: 718
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 Total
106
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
52
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
44
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
36
Field 1 Total
60
Field 2 Total
57
Field 3 Total
56
Field 4 Total
65


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026