Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 92 - -
Team Name: Trousdale County
Participant Name:
MADISON NEIGHBORS
Individual Rank: 50
Individual Total Score: 265
Team Rank: 17
Team Total Score: 778
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
33
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
30
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 Total
121
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
53
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Trees
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
53
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
38
Field 1 Total
74
Field 2 Total
63
Field 3 Total
67
Field 4 Total
61


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026