Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- SR Division
Overall

ID: 81 - -
Team Name: Lincoln County
Participant Name:
ELIJ* ROGERS
Individual Rank: 85
Individual Total Score: 241
Team Rank: 24
Team Total Score: 746
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
30
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
22
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 Total
105
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
20
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 Total
62
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
36
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
38
Field 1 Total
65
Field 2 Total
77
Field 3 Total
60
Field 4 Total
39


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026