Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- JR Division
Overall

ID: 365 - -
Team Name: White County Middle FFA
Participant Name:
SHELBY HENSLEY
Individual Rank: 17
Individual Total Score: 97
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 504
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Deep
Common
Excessively drained
Many
Medium
Moderately steep
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
17
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Medium
Sloping
Moderate
Depression
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
7
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Moderately deep
Common
Excessively drained
Low
Gently sloping
Severe
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
0
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Moderately deep
Common
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
6
Part 1 Total
30
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class VII
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
3
Part 2 Total
21
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
28
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
18
Field 1 Total
30
Field 2 Total
30
Field 3 Total
18
Field 4 Total
19


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026