Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- JR Division
Overall

ID: 399 - -
Team Name: Mt. Juliet Middle FFA
Participant Name:
HADLEY RHOADS
Individual Rank: 15
Individual Total Score: 136
Team Rank: 4
Team Total Score: 458
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
Common
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Very Steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
11
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Shallow
Common
Well-drained
Common
Low
Steep
Moderate
Depression
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
11
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Coarse
Very Shallow
Common
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
3
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
Common
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 Total
52
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Low
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Low
High
Low
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Medium
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Low
High
Low
Medium
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 Total
41
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 Total
23
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
20
Field 1 Total
26
Field 2 Total
30
Field 3 Total
23
Field 4 Total
57


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026