Middle Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
Middle TN Land Evaluation- JR Division
Overall

ID: 399 - -
Team Name: Mt. Juliet Middle FFA
Participant Name:
MIRA*E BLACKARD
Individual Rank: 16
Individual Total Score: 136
Team Rank: 4
Team Total Score: 458
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Moderately well-drained
Many
Medium
Very Steep
Severe
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
13
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Moderately deep
Common
Somewhat poorly-drained
Common
Low
Steep
Moderate
Depression
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
5
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Low
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
20
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
High
Steep
Moderate
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
8
Part 1 Total
46
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Low
High
Low
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Medium
Low
Medium
High
Medium
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
High
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Low
Medium
High
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Low
Class II
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 Total
43
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
19
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
28
Field 1 Total
37
Field 2 Total
28
Field 3 Total
39
Field 4 Total
32


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026