East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 194 - -
Team Name: SEYMOUR
Participant Name:
LEAH SULLIVAN
Individual Rank: 81
Individual Total Score: 171
Team Rank: 22
Team Total Score: 441
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
Common
Poorly-drained
Many
High
Sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
16
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
Moderate
Depression
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
15
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
Common
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 Total
83
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 Total
44
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
11
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 Total
36
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 Total
8
Field 1 Total
43
Field 2 Total
54
Field 3 Total
30
Field 4 Total
44


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026