East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 194 - -
Team Name: SEYMOUR
Participant Name:
RYLEE ROSIGNOL
Individual Rank: 88
Individual Total Score: 136
Team Rank: 22
Team Total Score: 441
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
Many
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Steep
Severe
Depression
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
10
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
15
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
Common
Moderately well-drained
Common
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 Total
63
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Low
Low
High
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Low
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
High
Low
High
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 Total
30
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 Total
21
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 Total
22
Field 1 Total
34
Field 2 Total
31
Field 3 Total
36
Field 4 Total
35


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026