East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 131 - -
Team Name: LENOIR CITY
Participant Name:
ERICSON SPECTOR
Individual Rank: 79
Individual Total Score: 178
Team Rank: 24
Team Total Score: 401
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Very Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
Many
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
22
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Very Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
16
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Very Shallow
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
22
Part 1 Total
89
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
High
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 Total
42
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
11
Part 3 Total
33
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Fair
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 Total
14
Field 1 Total
48
Field 2 Total
43
Field 3 Total
38
Field 4 Total
49


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026