East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 211 - -
Team Name: Tazewell FFA
Participant Name:
WILLIAM IVEY
Individual Rank: 50
Individual Total Score: 265
Team Rank: 12
Team Total Score: 849
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
37
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Very Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
Severe
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 Total
117
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
65
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
29
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
54
Field 1 Total
62
Field 2 Total
69
Field 3 Total
85
Field 4 Total
49


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026