East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 211 - -
Team Name: Tazewell FFA
Participant Name:
BRYSON CARDWELL
Individual Rank: 58
Individual Total Score: 247
Team Rank: 12
Team Total Score: 849
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
Common
Well-drained
Common
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
33
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
41
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 Total
132
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
64
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
17
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
34
Field 1 Total
59
Field 2 Total
70
Field 3 Total
66
Field 4 Total
52


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026