East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 159 - 1 -
Team Name: Johnson County
Participant Name:
JAKE ANDERSON
Individual Rank: 51
Individual Total Score: 263
Team Rank: 15
Team Total Score: 793
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
33
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
38
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 Total
141
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
High
High
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
20
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Medium
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Low
High
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 Total
54
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 Total
36
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
32
Field 1 Total
68
Field 2 Total
86
Field 3 Total
61
Field 4 Total
48


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026