East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 01, 2026
East TN Regional Land
Overall

ID: 101 - -
Team Name: HERITAGE
Participant Name:
KYLE KLEPPER
Individual Rank: 36
Individual Total Score: 289
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 886
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Many
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
38
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
31
Part 1 Total
133
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
65
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 Total
33
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 Total
58
Field 1 Total
71
Field 2 Total
73
Field 3 Total
78
Field 4 Total
67


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026