Tennessee State Land Evaluation
Nov 02, 2026
TN State Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 135 - -
Team Name: Livingston
Participant Name:
CALE JOHNSON
Individual Rank: 1
Individual Total Score: 372
Team Rank: 9
Team Total Score: 904
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
43
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
43
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 Total
166
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
High
Class I
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
Class IV
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
21
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class IV
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 Total
82
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
60
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 Total
64
Field 1 Total
97
Field 2 Total
93
Field 3 Total
92
Field 4 Total
90


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026