Tennessee State Land Evaluation
Nov 02, 2026
TN State Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 187 - -
Team Name: Grainger County
Participant Name:
CHESNEY CAMERON
Individual Rank: 8
Individual Total Score: 340
Team Rank: 1
Team Total Score: 1036
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Coarse
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Poorly-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 Total
155
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class IV
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Medium
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 Total
71
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
60
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
54
Field 1 Total
100
Field 2 Total
90
Field 3 Total
78
Field 4 Total
72


AWS100: Thursday, November 12, 2026