SMSU Ag Bowl
Feb 07, 2025
Agronomy CDE
Overall

ID: 254 - -
Team Name: Tracy Area
Participant Name:
LANE PETERSON
Individual Rank: 71
Individual Total Score: 147
Team Rank: 15
Team Total Score: 505
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Variety Selection #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1BC
2BB
3CA
4AA
5BC
6CC
7CD
8CA
9BC
10AC
Variety Selection #1-10 - Points per Question6
18
Variety Selection #11-20
Variety Selection #11-20 - Points per Question6
 
General Knowledge Exam #1-20
PartContestantJudge
1BB
2BB
3CC
4BC
5AA
6BB
7DD
8BB
9CD
10CC
11DA
12DD
13CC
14BB
15CD
16AB
17AC
18CB
19DC
20BB
Exam - Points per Question3
36
General Knowledge Exam #21-40
PartContestantJudge
21CC
22DA
23DC
24DA
25DD
26BB
27CB
28AB
29DD
30DC
31DA
32DA
33CB
34CB
35CC
36DD
37DB
38BB
39AB
40DA
Exam - Points per Question3
21
General Knowledge Exam #41-60
PartContestantJudge
41BB
42DA
43BB
44AB
45CD
Exam - Points per Question3
6
General Knowledge Exam Total
63
Practicum Score 1
 
Practicum Score 2
 
Practicum Score 3
 
Practicum Score 4
 
Insect ID - Identification
PartContestantJudge
1 * 25
2 * 23
3 * 21
4 * 24
5 * 27
6 * 15
7 * 28
8 2 22
9 * 15
10 * 30
Insect ID - Points per Identification2
0
Insect ID - Economic Impact
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 1
2 Identification 4
3 Identification 3
4 Identification 4
5 Identification 6
6 Identification 4
7 Identification 6
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 4
10 Identification 6
Insect ID - Points per Impact2
 
Insect ID - Mouth Parts
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 1
2 Identification 1
3 Identification 1
4 Identification 1
5 Identification 3
6 Identification 1
7 Identification 3
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 1
10 Identification 3
Insect ID - Points per Mouth Part2
 
Insect Identification Total
0
Crop Quality Placing 1
 
Crop Quality Placing 2
 
Crop Quality Reasons 1
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Crop Quality Reasons 2
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Grain Grading
PartContestantJudge
1  100
 
Variety Selection Score
PartContestantJudge
1  050
 
Disorders - Causal Categories
Disorders - Points per Causal Category3
 
Disorders - Agents
Disorders - Points per Agent4
 
Disorders - Part
Disorders - Points per Part3
 
Agronomic Disorders Total
 
Plant and Seed ID #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1 115 114
2 121 113
3 116 346
4 1 6 106
5 1 * 107
6 2 * 320
7 119 101
8 103 312
9 118 334
10 330 303
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID #11-20
PartContestantJudge
11 101 315
12 114 314
13 321 347
14 122 121
15 120 119
16 203 103
17 117 116
18 112 112
19 304 210
20 103 202
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #21-30
PartContestantJudge
21 210 201
22 2 * 208
23 330 110
24 101 204
25 3 7 206
26 110 203
27 102 211
28 114 205
29 209 102
30 101 209
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID #31-40
PartContestantJudge
31 111 207
32 109 108
33 110 109
34 111 111
35 105 105
36 112 120
37 204 331
38 120 306
39 313 305
40 103 333
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
12
Plant and Seed ID #41-50
PartContestantJudge
41 110 115
42 114 328
43 309 302
44 112 318
45 *4 336
46 116 325
47 110 321
48 334 335
49 306 322
50 311 311
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID Total
24
Equipment/Machinery ID
Equipment/Machinery - Points per ID5
 
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt
PartContestantJudge
1EE
2BB
3BB
4EC
5AD
6AA
7EE
8CC
9CC
10CE
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt - Points per Question6
42
Issues Interview
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 5
2 Identification 5
3 Identification 5
4 Identification 5
5 Identification 5
6 Identification 5
Issues Interview - Point Values1,2,2,3,4,8
 
Issues Interview Score
 
Commodity Evaluation Total
18
Pest Management Total
0
Team Preparation - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Total
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Total
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Total
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Total
 
Team Preparation Score
 
Team Written Proposal Score
 
Team Written Plan Score
 
Team Presentation and Questions Score
 
Team Exam A - Pest
 
Team Exam B - Nutrient
 
Team Exam C - Soil/Water
 
Team Exam D - Crop
 
Team Exam E - Questions
 
Team Exam Total
 
Team Activity Total
 


AWS100: Saturday, August 2, 2025