SMSU Ag Bowl
Feb 07, 2025
Agronomy CDE
Overall

ID: 199 - -
Team Name: Heron Lake-Okabena
Participant Name:
LAURYN HENDEL
Individual Rank: 76
Individual Total Score: 125
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 914
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Variety Selection #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1CC
2AB
3DA
4BA
5BC
6DC
7CD
8CA
9BC
10CC
Variety Selection #1-10 - Points per Question6
12
Variety Selection #11-20
Variety Selection #11-20 - Points per Question6
 
General Knowledge Exam #1-20
PartContestantJudge
1AB
2CB
3BC
4BC
5AA
6DB
7DD
8AB
9BD
10CC
11DA
12DD
13CC
14CB
15DD
16AB
17CC
18BB
19CC
20BB
Exam - Points per Question3
30
General Knowledge Exam #21-40
PartContestantJudge
21CC
22BA
23BC
24DA
25DD
26BB
27BB
28AB
29DD
30DC
31AA
32BA
33CB
34AB
35CC
36CD
37DB
38CB
39AB
40DA
Exam - Points per Question3
21
General Knowledge Exam #41-60
PartContestantJudge
41CB
42AA
43BB
44AB
45BD
Exam - Points per Question3
6
General Knowledge Exam Total
57
Practicum Score 1
 
Practicum Score 2
 
Practicum Score 3
 
Practicum Score 4
 
Insect ID - Identification
PartContestantJudge
1 25 25
2 32 23
3 26 21
4 23 24
5 16 27
6 28 15
7 27 28
8 24 22
9 19 15
10 31 30
Insect ID - Points per Identification2
2
Insect ID - Economic Impact
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 1
2 Identification 4
3 Identification 3
4 Identification 4
5 Identification 6
6 Identification 4
7 Identification 6
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 4
10 Identification 6
Insect ID - Points per Impact2
 
Insect ID - Mouth Parts
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 1
2 Identification 1
3 Identification 1
4 Identification 1
5 Identification 3
6 Identification 1
7 Identification 3
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 1
10 Identification 3
Insect ID - Points per Mouth Part2
 
Insect Identification Total
2
Crop Quality Placing 1
 
Crop Quality Placing 2
 
Crop Quality Reasons 1
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Crop Quality Reasons 2
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Grain Grading
PartContestantJudge
1  100
 
Variety Selection Score
PartContestantJudge
1  050
 
Disorders - Causal Categories
Disorders - Points per Causal Category3
 
Disorders - Agents
Disorders - Points per Agent4
 
Disorders - Part
Disorders - Points per Part3
 
Agronomic Disorders Total
 
Plant and Seed ID #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1 115 114
2 102 113
3 305 346
4 106 106
5 105 107
6 342 320
7 322 101
8 318 312
9 316 334
10 313 303
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #11-20
PartContestantJudge
11 312 315
12 118 314
13 302 347
14 306 121
15 112 119
16 113 103
17 117 116
18 114 112
19 111 210
20 210 202
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID #21-30
PartContestantJudge
21 203 201
22 101 208
23 208 110
24 110 204
25 206 206
26 204 203
27 207 211
28 119 205
29 103 102
30 122 209
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #31-40
PartContestantJudge
31 120 207
32 108 108
33 321 109
34 202 111
35 104 105
36 205 120
37 201 331
38 337 306
39 211 305
40 334 333
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #41-50
PartContestantJudge
41 331 115
42 335 328
43 325 302
44 320 318
45 336
46 301 325
47 209 321
48 116 335
49 315 322
50 304 311
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID Total
18
Equipment/Machinery ID
Equipment/Machinery - Points per ID5
 
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt
PartContestantJudge
1EE
2BB
3BB
4DC
5DD
6AA
7EE
8EC
9BC
10CE
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt - Points per Question6
36
Issues Interview
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 5
2 Identification 5
3 Identification 5
4 Identification 5
5 Identification 5
6 Identification 5
Issues Interview - Point Values1,2,2,3,4,8
 
Issues Interview Score
 
Commodity Evaluation Total
12
Pest Management Total
2
Team Preparation - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Total
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Total
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Total
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Total
 
Team Preparation Score
 
Team Written Proposal Score
 
Team Written Plan Score
 
Team Presentation and Questions Score
 
Team Exam A - Pest
 
Team Exam B - Nutrient
 
Team Exam C - Soil/Water
 
Team Exam D - Crop
 
Team Exam E - Questions
 
Team Exam Total
 
Team Activity Total
 


AWS100: Sunday, June 15, 2025