Tarleton State Invitational CDEs
Mar 27, 2025
ENR
Overall

ID: 1119 - -
Team Name: Klein Collins
Participant Name:
ELIZABET BROWN
Individual Rank: 40
Individual Total Score: 451
Team Rank: 7
Team Total Score: 229.2308
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Land Part 1
PartContestantJudge
1Surface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 2. Moderately Deep
Slope: 1. Nearly Level
Erosion: 1. None to Slight
Permeability: 3. Slow
Surface Runoff: 4. Very Slow
Major Factors: Texture
Major Factors: Depth
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Permeability
Major Factors: Runoff
Land Capability Class: 2. II
Surface Texture: 2. Moderately Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 4. Very Slow
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Major Factors: Permeability
Land Capability Class: 4. IV
Land Part 1 - Point ValuesSurface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09
6
Land Part 2
PartContestantJudge
1
  • Every 3rd or 4th year

  • Every 2nd year

  • Control brush or trees

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Construct diversion terraces

  • Install drainage system

  • Control gullies

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Every year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Land Part 2 - Point Values1-4. Row Crop 06
    5. Crop Residue 05
    6. Conservation Tillage 05
    7. Legumes 00
    8. Range Mgmt 00
    9. Burning 00
    10. Grazing 00
    11. Plant Trees 00
    12. Harvest Trees 00
    13. Wildlife 00
    14. Control Brush 00
    15. Contours 06
    16. Terraces 06
    17. Diversion Terraces 00
    18. Drainage 00
    19. Gullies 00
    20. No Mechanical 00
    21. Soil Amendments 00
    22. Phosphorus 06
    23. Potassium 06
    24. Nitrogen 00
    25. No Fertilizer 00
    18
    Land Judging Total
    24
    Water Quality - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    1Identification 1Identification 1
     
    Water Quality - Test #1 - pH
    PartContestantJudge
    1 081 081
    Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance4
    Water Quality - Test #1 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature
    PartContestantJudge
    1 152 152
    Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance1
    Water Quality - Test #2 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 15 20
    Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance5
    Water Quality - Test #3 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #4
     
    Water Quality - Test #5
     
    Water Quality - Test #6
     
    Water Quality - Limiting Factors
    PartContestantJudge
    1AA
    2BB
    3AA
    4AB
    5DD
    6CB
    7AD
    8CC
    9BB
    10AD
    Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ4
    24
    Water Quality Total
    84
    Written Exam
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2BA
    3DD
    4BA
    5BB
    6BB
    7BB
    8CD
    9AA
    10AD
    11BD
    12BB
    13BB
    14CC
    15DC
    16AA
    17CC
    18BB
    19CC
    20AA
    21BB
    22CA
    23CC
    24CC
    25DD
    26BA
    27DD
    28CC
    29DD
    30AB
    31BB
    32BB
    33CC
    34BA
    35BB
    36AA
    37AA
    38AA
    39CC
    40AA
    41CB
    42BB
    43CD
    44DB
    45AC
    46BB
    47DD
    48DD
    49AA
    50DD
    Written Exam - Points per Question2
    72
    Data Interpretation
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2BB
    3BB
    4DD
    5CC
    6CC
    7BB
    8BB
    9CC
    10AA
    Data Interpretation - Points per Question10
    100
    Waste Management
    PartContestantJudge
    1BB
    2BB
    3CC
    4BB
    5AA
    6CC
    7AA
    8BB
    9BB
    10AA
    Waste Management - Points per Question10
    100
    Identification #1-10
    PartContestantJudge
    1 636 627
    2 402 406
    3 623 623
    4 116 116
    5 628 628
    6 606 606
    7 619 619
    8 106 106
    9 621 621
    10 105 105
    Identification - Points per ID2
    16
    Identification #11-20
    PartContestantJudge
    11 608 608
    12 412 716
    13 715 715
    14 102 102
    15 325 325
    16 110 110
    17 203 714
    18 226 226
    19 307 307
    20 219 219
    Identification - Points per ID2
    16
    Identification #21-30
    PartContestantJudge
    21 201 201
    22 309 315
    23 305 305
    24 634 601
    25 231 208
    26 111 111
    27 230 211
    28 708 708
    29 709 709
    30 612 612
    Identification - Points per ID2
    12
    Identification #31-40
    PartContestantJudge
    31 233 233
    32 315 316
    33 225 227
    34 618 618
    35 701 701
    36 706 706
    37 509 509
    38 622 622
    39 103 103
    40 635 635
    Identification - Points per ID2
    16
    Identification #41-50
    PartContestantJudge
    41 713 224
    42 631 617
    43 232 231
    44 614 614
    45 109 109
    46 637 637
    47 416 416
    48 616 624
    49 234 217
    50 625 625
    Identification - Points per ID2
    10
    Identification Total
    70
    GPS - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    111
     
    GPS - Multiple Choice
    PartContestantJudge
    1DC
    2BA
    3BB
    4DA
    5AD
    6DB
    7DA
    8DC
    9DB
    10CD
    GPS Multiple Choice - Points per Question1
    1
    GPS - Lat/Lon Coordinate 2
    GPS Coordinate 2 Tolerance3
    GPS Coordinate 2 Point Value50
     
    GPS - UTM Coordinate 3
    PartContestantJudge
    1East 0578233
    North 3565750
    East 0578222
    North 3565686
    GPS Coordinate 3 Tolerance5
    GPS Coordinate 3 Point Value50
    0
    GPS #4
    PartContestantJudge
    1 226 064
    GPS #4 Tolerance6
    GPS #4 Point Value40
    0
    GPS #5
    GPS #5 Tolerance3
    GPS #5 Point Value20
     
    GPS #6
     
    GPS #7
     
    GPS #8
     
    GPS #9
     
    GPS #10
     
    GPS Total
    1
    Practicum Score 1
     
    Practicum Score 2
     
    Practicum Score 3
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Total
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Total
     
    Teamwork Score
     
    Team Written/Pres Score
     


    AWS100: Friday, June 13, 2025