Tarleton State Invitational CDEs
Mar 27, 2025
ENR
Overall

ID: 43 - -
Team Name: James Madison
Participant Name:
KYLYNN JACOBSON
Individual Rank: 32
Individual Total Score: 500
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 336.9231
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Land Part 1
PartContestantJudge
1Surface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 3. Slow
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Depth
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Major Factors: Permeability
Major Factors: Runoff
Major Factors: Wetness
Major Factors: Flooding
Land Capability Class: 2. II
Surface Texture: 2. Moderately Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 4. Very Slow
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Major Factors: Permeability
Land Capability Class: 4. IV
Land Part 1 - Point ValuesSurface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09
30
Land Part 2
PartContestantJudge
1
  • Every 3rd or 4th year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Control brush or trees

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Every year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Land Part 2 - Point Values1-4. Row Crop 06
    5. Crop Residue 05
    6. Conservation Tillage 05
    7. Legumes 00
    8. Range Mgmt 00
    9. Burning 00
    10. Grazing 00
    11. Plant Trees 00
    12. Harvest Trees 00
    13. Wildlife 00
    14. Control Brush 00
    15. Contours 06
    16. Terraces 06
    17. Diversion Terraces 00
    18. Drainage 00
    19. Gullies 00
    20. No Mechanical 00
    21. Soil Amendments 00
    22. Phosphorus 06
    23. Potassium 06
    24. Nitrogen 00
    25. No Fertilizer 00
    28
    Land Judging Total
    58
    Water Quality - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    1Identification 1Identification 1
     
    Water Quality - Test #1 - pH
    PartContestantJudge
    1 084 081
    Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance4
    Water Quality - Test #1 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature
    PartContestantJudge
    1 150 152
    Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance1
    Water Quality - Test #2 Value20
    0
    Water Quality - Test #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 15 20
    Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance5
    Water Quality - Test #3 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #4
     
    Water Quality - Test #5
     
    Water Quality - Test #6
     
    Water Quality - Limiting Factors
    PartContestantJudge
    1BA
    2BB
    3DA
    4AB
    5DD
    6AB
    7BD
    8AC
    9AB
    10DD
    Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ4
    12
    Water Quality Total
    52
    Written Exam
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2AA
    3DD
    4BA
    5DB
    6CB
    7BB
    8CD
    9AA
    10AD
    11BD
    12BB
    13BB
    14CC
    15BC
    16AA
    17CC
    18BB
    19CC
    20BA
    21BB
    22CA
    23CC
    24CC
    25BD
    26DA
    27DD
    28CC
    29DD
    30DB
    31BB
    32BB
    33CC
    34DA
    35BB
    36AA
    37AA
    38AA
    39CC
    40AA
    41CB
    42CB
    43DD
    44BB
    45AC
    46BB
    47DD
    48DD
    49AA
    50DD
    Written Exam - Points per Question2
    68
    Data Interpretation
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2BB
    3BB
    4DD
    5CC
    6CC
    7BB
    8BB
    9CC
    10AA
    Data Interpretation - Points per Question10
    100
    Waste Management
    PartContestantJudge
    1BB
    2BB
    3CC
    4BB
    5AA
    6CC
    7AA
    8BB
    9BB
    10AA
    Waste Management - Points per Question10
    100
    Identification #1-10
    PartContestantJudge
    1 626 627
    2 406 406
    3 623 623
    4 116 116
    5 628 628
    6 606 606
    7 622 619
    8 106 106
    9 621 621
    10 105 105
    Identification - Points per ID2
    16
    Identification #11-20
    PartContestantJudge
    11 608 608
    12 405 716
    13 715 715
    14 102 102
    15 325 325
    16 110 110
    17 203 714
    18 225 226
    19 307 307
    20 219 219
    Identification - Points per ID2
    14
    Identification #21-30
    PartContestantJudge
    21 201 201
    22 304 315
    23 305 305
    24 603 601
    25 224 208
    26 111 111
    27 211 211
    28 708 708
    29 700 709
    30 612 612
    Identification - Points per ID2
    12
    Identification #31-40
    PartContestantJudge
    31 233 233
    32 316 316
    33 223 227
    34 618 618
    35 506 701
    36 706 706
    37 509 509
    38 619 622
    39 103 103
    40 602 635
    Identification - Points per ID2
    12
    Identification #41-50
    PartContestantJudge
    41 232 224
    42 617 617
    43 231 231
    44 614 614
    45 109 109
    46 637 637
    47 416 416
    48 622 624
    49 719 217
    50 625 625
    Identification - Points per ID2
    14
    Identification Total
    68
    GPS - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    141
     
    GPS - Multiple Choice
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2DA
    3CB
    4DA
    5DD
    6CB
    7DA
    8BC
    9BB
    10CD
    11B 
    GPS Multiple Choice - Points per Question1
    4
    GPS - Lat/Lon Coordinate 2
    GPS Coordinate 2 Tolerance3
    GPS Coordinate 2 Point Value50
     
    GPS - UTM Coordinate 3
    PartContestantJudge
    1East 0578227
    North 3565696
    East 0578222
    North 3565686
    GPS Coordinate 3 Tolerance5
    GPS Coordinate 3 Point Value50
    50
    GPS #4
    PartContestantJudge
    1 055 064
    GPS #4 Tolerance6
    GPS #4 Point Value40
    0
    GPS #5
    GPS #5 Tolerance3
    GPS #5 Point Value20
     
    GPS #6
     
    GPS #7
     
    GPS #8
     
    GPS #9
     
    GPS #10
     
    GPS Total
    54
    Practicum Score 1
     
    Practicum Score 2
     
    Practicum Score 3
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Total
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Total
     
    Teamwork Score
     
    Team Written/Pres Score
     


    AWS100: Sunday, June 15, 2025