Tarleton State Invitational CDEs
Mar 27, 2025
ENR
Overall

ID: 1110 - -
Team Name: Stony Point
Participant Name:
NEVE KRAWCZYK
Individual Rank: 30
Individual Total Score: 506
Team Rank: 4
Team Total Score: 330.7692
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Land Part 1
PartContestantJudge
1Surface Texture: 1. Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 3. Medium
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 2. Moderate
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Texture
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Land Capability Class: 3. III
Surface Texture: 2. Moderately Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 4. Very Slow
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Major Factors: Permeability
Land Capability Class: 4. IV
Land Part 1 - Point ValuesSurface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09
24
Land Part 2
PartContestantJudge
1
  • Every 2nd year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Est. recom. grass or grass & legumes

  • Proper pasture & range mgmt.

  • Maintain terraces

  • Construct diversion terraces

  • Nitrogen, Phosphate & Potash (NPK)
  • Every year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Land Part 2 - Point Values1-4. Row Crop 06
    5. Crop Residue 05
    6. Conservation Tillage 05
    7. Legumes 00
    8. Range Mgmt 00
    9. Burning 00
    10. Grazing 00
    11. Plant Trees 00
    12. Harvest Trees 00
    13. Wildlife 00
    14. Control Brush 00
    15. Contours 06
    16. Terraces 06
    17. Diversion Terraces 00
    18. Drainage 00
    19. Gullies 00
    20. No Mechanical 00
    21. Soil Amendments 00
    22. Phosphorus 06
    23. Potassium 06
    24. Nitrogen 00
    25. No Fertilizer 00
    16
    Land Judging Total
    40
    Water Quality - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    1Identification 1Identification 1
     
    Water Quality - Test #1 - pH
    PartContestantJudge
    1 080 081
    Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance4
    Water Quality - Test #1 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature
    PartContestantJudge
    1 152 152
    Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance1
    Water Quality - Test #2 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 21 20
    Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance5
    Water Quality - Test #3 Value20
    20
    Water Quality - Test #4
     
    Water Quality - Test #5
     
    Water Quality - Test #6
     
    Water Quality - Limiting Factors
    PartContestantJudge
    1DA
    2AB
    3AA
    4BB
    5DD
    6BB
    7DD
    8CC
    9DB
    10BD
    Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ4
    24
    Water Quality Total
    84
    Written Exam
    PartContestantJudge
    1BC
    2DA
    3DD
    4BA
    5BB
    6BB
    7BB
    8DD
    9AA
    10AD
    11BD
    12AB
    13BB
    14CC
    15BC
    16AA
    17BC
    18BB
    19CC
    20AA
    21BB
    22CA
    23DC
    24CC
    25CD
    26BA
    27DD
    28CC
    29AD
    30AB
    31DB
    32CB
    33CC
    34BA
    35BB
    36BA
    37DA
    38AA
    39BC
    40AA
    41BB
    42BB
    43DD
    44CB
    45DC
    46BB
    47DD
    48DD
    49AA
    50DD
    Written Exam - Points per Question2
    56
    Data Interpretation
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2BB
    3BB
    4DD
    5CC
    6CC
    7BB
    8BB
    9CC
    10AA
    Data Interpretation - Points per Question10
    100
    Waste Management
    PartContestantJudge
    1BB
    2BB
    3CC
    4BB
    5CA
    6CC
    7AA
    8BB
    9CB
    10AA
    Waste Management - Points per Question10
    80
    Identification #1-10
    PartContestantJudge
    1 635 627
    2 406 406
    3 623 623
    4 117 116
    5 612 628
    6 606 606
    7 610 619
    8 106 106
    9 617 621
    10 105 105
    Identification - Points per ID2
    10
    Identification #11-20
    PartContestantJudge
    11 608 608
    12 717 716
    13 715 715
    14 104 102
    15 325 325
    16 110 110
    17 203 714
    18 226 226
    19 507 307
    20 219 219
    Identification - Points per ID2
    12
    Identification #21-30
    PartContestantJudge
    21 201 201
    22 308 315
    23 305 305
    24 603 601
    25 208 208
    26 111 111
    27 227 211
    28 708 708
    29 709 709
    30 607 612
    Identification - Points per ID2
    12
    Identification #31-40
    PartContestantJudge
    31 233 233
    32 316 316
    33 713 227
    34 631 618
    35 201 701
    36 321 706
    37 512 509
    38 633 622
    39 103 103
    40 601 635
    Identification - Points per ID2
    6
    Identification #41-50
    PartContestantJudge
    41 224 224
    42 617 617
    43 225 231
    44 612 614
    45 109 109
    46 637 637
    47 416 416
    48 611 624
    49 217 217
    50 625 625
    Identification - Points per ID2
    14
    Identification Total
    54
    GPS - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    151
     
    GPS - Multiple Choice
    PartContestantJudge
    1AC
    2AA
    3CB
    4DA
    5CD
    6DB
    7BA
    8DC
    9DB
    10AD
    GPS Multiple Choice - Points per Question1
    2
    GPS - Lat/Lon Coordinate 2
    GPS Coordinate 2 Tolerance3
    GPS Coordinate 2 Point Value50
     
    GPS - UTM Coordinate 3
    PartContestantJudge
    1East 0578198
    North 3565689
    East 0578222
    North 3565686
    GPS Coordinate 3 Tolerance5
    GPS Coordinate 3 Point Value50
    50
    GPS #4
    PartContestantJudge
    1 090 064
    GPS #4 Tolerance6
    GPS #4 Point Value40
    40
    GPS #5
    GPS #5 Tolerance3
    GPS #5 Point Value20
     
    GPS #6
     
    GPS #7
     
    GPS #8
     
    GPS #9
     
    GPS #10
     
    GPS Total
    92
    Practicum Score 1
     
    Practicum Score 2
     
    Practicum Score 3
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Total
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Total
     
    Teamwork Score
     
    Team Written/Pres Score
     


    AWS100: Saturday, April 26, 2025