Tarleton State Invitational CDEs
Mar 27, 2025
ENR
Overall

ID: 561 - -
Team Name: Natalia
Participant Name:
JUL* GARCIA
Individual Rank: 65
Individual Total Score: 155
Team Rank: 16
Team Total Score: 24.61539
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Land Part 1
PartContestantJudge
1Surface Texture: 2. Moderately Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine
Depth of Soil: 2. Moderately Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 1. None to Slight
Permeability: 2. Moderate
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Texture
Major Factors: Depth
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Permeability
Major Factors: Runoff
Land Capability Class: 4. IV
Surface Texture: 2. Moderately Coarse
Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine
Depth of Soil: 1. Deep
Slope: 2. Gently Sloping
Erosion: 2. Moderate
Permeability: 4. Very Slow
Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate
Major Factors: Slope
Major Factors: Erosion
Major Factors: Permeability
Land Capability Class: 4. IV
Land Part 1 - Point ValuesSurface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09
27
Land Part 2
PartContestantJudge
1
  • Protect from burning

  • Plant recom. trees

  • Harvest trees selectively

  • Use only for wildlife or recreation area

  • Construct diversion terraces

  • No mech. treatment needed

  • Phosphate (P)
  • Every year

  • Do not burn crop residue

  • Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage

  • Terrace & farm on contour

  • Maintain terraces

  • Phosphate (P)

  • Potash (K)
  • Land Part 2 - Point Values1-4. Row Crop 06
    5. Crop Residue 05
    6. Conservation Tillage 05
    7. Legumes 00
    8. Range Mgmt 00
    9. Burning 00
    10. Grazing 00
    11. Plant Trees 00
    12. Harvest Trees 00
    13. Wildlife 00
    14. Control Brush 00
    15. Contours 06
    16. Terraces 06
    17. Diversion Terraces 00
    18. Drainage 00
    19. Gullies 00
    20. No Mechanical 00
    21. Soil Amendments 00
    22. Phosphorus 06
    23. Potassium 06
    24. Nitrogen 00
    25. No Fertilizer 00
    6
    Land Judging Total
    33
    Water Quality - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    1Identification 1Identification 1
     
    Water Quality - Test #1 - pH
    PartContestantJudge
    1 102 081
    Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance4
    Water Quality - Test #1 Value20
    0
    Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature
    PartContestantJudge
    1 43 152
    Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance1
    Water Quality - Test #2 Value20
    0
    Water Quality - Test #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 10 20
    Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance5
    Water Quality - Test #3 Value20
    0
    Water Quality - Test #4
     
    Water Quality - Test #5
     
    Water Quality - Test #6
     
    Water Quality - Limiting Factors
    PartContestantJudge
    1 A
    2 B
    3 A
    4 B
    5 D
    6 B
    7 D
    8 C
    9 B
    10 D
    Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ4
     
    Water Quality Total
    0
    Written Exam
    PartContestantJudge
    1 C
    2 A
    3 D
    4 A
    5 B
    6 B
    7 B
    8 D
    9 A
    10 D
    11 D
    12 B
    13 B
    14 C
    15 C
    16 A
    17 C
    18 B
    19 C
    20 A
    21 B
    22 A
    23 C
    24 C
    25 D
    26 A
    27 D
    28 C
    29 D
    30 B
    31 B
    32 B
    33 C
    34 A
    35 B
    36 A
    37 A
    38 A
    39 C
    40 A
    41 B
    42 B
    43 D
    44 B
    45 C
    46 B
    47 D
    48 D
    49 A
    50 D
    Written Exam - Points per Question2
     
    Data Interpretation
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2CB
    3BB
    4DD
    5CC
    6CC
    7BB
    8BB
    9CC
    10AA
    11B 
    12B 
    13C 
    14B 
    15A 
    16C 
    17A 
    18B 
    19B 
    20A 
    Data Interpretation - Points per Question10
    90
    Waste Management
    PartContestantJudge
    1 B
    2 B
    3 C
    4 B
    5 A
    6 C
    7 A
    8 B
    9 B
    10 A
    Waste Management - Points per Question10
     
    Identification #1-10
    PartContestantJudge
    1 627
    2 406
    3 623
    4 117 116
    5 628
    6 606
    7 619
    8 106 106
    9 621
    10 105 105
    Identification - Points per ID2
    4
    Identification #11-20
    PartContestantJudge
    11 622 608
    12 716
    13 715
    14 102 102
    15 325
    16 110 110
    17 227 714
    18 226 226
    19 307 307
    20 219 219
    Identification - Points per ID2
    10
    Identification #21-30
    PartContestantJudge
    21 402 201
    22 322 315
    23 305 305
    24 601
    25 329 208
    26 111 111
    27 211
    28 309 708
    29 209 709
    30  612
    Identification - Points per ID2
    4
    Identification #31-40
    PartContestantJudge
    31 233 233
    32 316 316
    33 218 227
    34 618
    35 7* 701
    36 706
    37 509 509
    38  622
    39  103
    40  635
    Identification - Points per ID2
    6
    Identification #41-50
    PartContestantJudge
    41 224
    42 617
    43 231
    44 614
    45 109 109
    46 602 637
    47 416 416
    48 624
    49 229 217
    50 625 625
    Identification - Points per ID2
    6
    Identification Total
    30
    GPS - Test Number
    PartContestantJudge
    111
     
    GPS - Multiple Choice
    PartContestantJudge
    1CC
    2DA
    3AB
    4AA
    5AD
    6CB
    7CA
    8BC
    9CB
    10BD
    GPS Multiple Choice - Points per Question1
    2
    GPS - Lat/Lon Coordinate 2
    PartContestantJudge
    103461230141533  
    GPS Coordinate 2 Tolerance3
    GPS Coordinate 2 Point Value50
     
    GPS - UTM Coordinate 3
    PartContestantJudge
    1East 3224343
    North 032 422
    East 0578222
    North 3565686
    GPS Coordinate 3 Tolerance5
    GPS Coordinate 3 Point Value50
    0
    GPS #4
    PartContestantJudge
    1 243 064
    GPS #4 Tolerance6
    GPS #4 Point Value40
    0
    GPS #5
    GPS #5 Tolerance3
    GPS #5 Point Value20
     
    GPS #6
     
    GPS #7
     
    GPS #8
     
    GPS #9
     
    GPS #10
     
    GPS Total
    2
    Practicum Score 1
     
    Practicum Score 2
     
    Practicum Score 3
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1 Identification 5
    2 Identification 5
    3 Identification 5
    4 Identification 5
    5 Identification 5
    Teamwork Rubric - Point Values6,2,4,2,6
     
    Teamwork Rubric - Total
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #1
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #2
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Judge #3
    PartContestantJudge
    1  10
    2  10
    3  10
    4  10
    5  10
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Point Values20,20,20,10,10
     
    Team Written/Pres Rubric - Total
     
    Teamwork Score
     
    Team Written/Pres Score
     


    AWS100: Monday, June 16, 2025