DAN WILSON - Cedar Park - ENR - Tarleton State CDEs

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

Tarleton State CDEs
Apr 24, 2025
ENR

Overall

ID:	1102 - -
Team Name:	Cedar Park
Participant Name:	DAN WILSON
Individual Rank:	63
Individual Total Score:	367
Team Rank:	22
Team Total Score:	1064
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Land Part 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Surface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine Subsurface Texture: 3. Medium Depth of Soil: 2. Moderately Deep Slope: 4. Strong Sloping Erosion: 1. None to Slight Permeability: 3. Slow Surface Runoff: 3. Slow Major Factors: Texture Major Factors: Permeability Major Factors: Wetness Land Capability Class: 5. V	Surface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine Subsurface Texture: 5. Fine Depth of Soil: 3. Shallow Slope: 2. Gently Sloping Erosion: 2. Moderate Permeability: 4. Very Slow Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate Major Factors: Depth Major Factors: Slope Major Factors: Erosion Major Factors: Permeability Land Capability Class: 4. IV

Land Part 1 - Point Values

Surface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09

Land Part 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Every year Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage Protect from burning Plant recom. trees Control brush or trees Construct diversion terraces No mech. treatment needed Nitrogen, Phosphate & Potash (NPK)	Every year Do not burn crop residue Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage Terrace & farm on contour Maintain terraces Lime Phosphate (P)

Land Part 2 - Point Values

1-4. Row Crop 06
5. Crop Residue 05
6. Conservation Tillage 05
7. Legumes 00
8. Range Mgmt 00
9. Burning 00
10. Grazing 00
11. Plant Trees 00
12. Harvest Trees 00
13. Wildlife 00
14. Control Brush 00
15. Contours 06
16. Terraces 06
17. Diversion Terraces 00
18. Drainage 00
19. Gullies 00
20. No Mechanical 00
21. Soil Amendments 06
22. Phosphorus 06
23. Potassium 00
24. Nitrogen 00
25. No Fertilizer 00

Land Judging Total

Water Quality - Test Number

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Identification 1	Identification 1

Water Quality - Test #1 - pH

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	80	056

Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance	2
Water Quality - Test #1 Value	20

Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	202	203

Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance	1
Water Quality - Test #2 Value	20

Water Quality - Test #3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	15	10

Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance	3
Water Quality - Test #3 Value	20

Water Quality - Test #4

Water Quality - Test #5

Water Quality - Test #6

Water Quality - Limiting Factors

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	C	C
2	D	D
3	C	A
4	C	C
5	A	A
6	B	B
7	D	D
8	C	C
9	D	D
10	B	C

Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ

Water Quality Total

Written Exam

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	C	D
2	A	B
3	C	C
4	A	B
5	A	A
6	B	B
7	A	A
8	B	B
9	B	D
10	B	B
11	B	D
12	C	C
13	B	D
14	B	B
15	B	A
16	C	C
17	C	A
18	D	D
19	B	B
20	D	C
21	A	A
22	B	B
23	C	C
24	A	A
25	A	D
26	A	A
27	A	B
28	B	C
29	A	A
30	C	C
31	C	C
32	C	C
33	B	B
34	D	D
35	D	D
36	B	B
37	C	D
38	A	A
39	B	B
40	A	A
41	D	D
42	A	B
43	B	A
44	B	B
45	A	B
46	C	C
47	D	D
48	C	C
49	A	A
50	D	D

Written Exam - Points per Question

Data Interpretation

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	A	A
2	D	D
3	D	D
4	B	B
5	B	B
6	B	B
7	B	C
8	B	B
9	D	C
10	B	D

Data Interpretation - Points per Question

Waste Management

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	B	B
2	D	C
3	B	B
4	D	D
5	C	C
6	D	D
7	C	C
8	A	D
9	D	D
10	C	C

Waste Management - Points per Question

Identification #1-10

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	411	401
2	625	631
3	415	415
4	607	603
5	306	327
6	406	406
7	605	622
8	616	613
9	205	710
10	303	308