Ohio District 9 Soils
Oct 01, 2025
2025 District 9 Urban Soils HS -Revised
Overall

ID: 308 - -
Team Name: East Clinton Great Oaks
Participant Name:
CARSON CAREY
Individual Rank: 3
Individual Total Score: 852
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 2389

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
13 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
22 - Medium
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
100
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
11 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
2 - 2-6% gently sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
44 - Moderately deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
70
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
11 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
1 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
90
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
12 - 2-6% gently sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
90
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Total
350
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Part 2 - Points per Item5
20
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1Slight
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Total
50
Part 3 Management - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1








Part 3 - Points per Item4
100
Part 3 Management - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1













Part 3 - Points per Item4
96
Part 3 Management - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1






Part 3 - Points per Item4
92
Part 3 Management - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1








Part 3 - Points per Item4
84
Part 3 Management - Total
372
Site 1 Total
220
Site 2 Total
176
Site 3 Total
192
Site 4 Total
184
Written Exam Section A
PartContestantJudge
1AA
2CC
3BA
4BB
5AD
6CC
7BB
8BB
9BB
10DC
11CC
12AB
13BB
14BC
15AA
Written Exam A - Points per Question4
40
Written Exam Section B
PartContestantJudge
1CC
2DD
3DD
4AA
5DD
6CC
7BB
8CC
9AA
10CC
Written Exam B - Points Per Question4
40


AWS100: Monday, November 3, 2025