Ohio District 9 Soils
Oct 01, 2025
2025 District 9 Urban Soils HS -Revised
Overall

ID: 308 - -
Team Name: East Clinton Great Oaks
Participant Name:
LUKE BROWN
Individual Rank: 45
Individual Total Score: 603
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 2389

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
14 - 12-18% moderately steep
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
24 - Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
40
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
12 - 2-6% gently sloping
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
15 - Coarse
21 - Moderately Coarse
26 - Moderately Coarse
33 - Platy
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
2 - 2-6% gently sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
44 - Moderately deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
50
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
13 - 6-12% sloping
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
15 - Coarse
21 - Moderately Coarse
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
1 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
60
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
12 - 2-6% gently sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
26 - Moderately Coarse
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
35 - Well drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
80
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Total
230
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1Severe
Severe
Severe
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Part 2 - Points per Item5
0
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1Slight
Severe
Slight
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
5
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Severe
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Total
25
Part 3 Management - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1









Part 3 - Points per Item4
80
Part 3 Management - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1












Part 3 - Points per Item4
60
Part 3 Management - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1









Part 3 - Points per Item4
72
Part 3 Management - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1












Part 3 - Points per Item4
76
Part 3 Management - Total
288
Site 1 Total
120
Site 2 Total
115
Site 3 Total
142
Site 4 Total
166
Written Exam Section A
PartContestantJudge
1AA
2CC
3BA
4CB
5DD
6BC
7DB
8BB
9BB
10BC
11DC
12CB
13AB
14CC
15AA
Written Exam A - Points per Question4
28
Written Exam Section B
PartContestantJudge
1DC
2DD
3DD
4AA
5DD
6CC
7BB
8CC
9AA
10AC
Written Exam B - Points Per Question4
32


AWS100: Monday, November 3, 2025