East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 105 - -
Team Name: CAMPBELL COUNTY
Participant Name:
LIDD* MURP*
Individual Rank: 19
Individual Total Score: 172
Team Rank: 7
Team Total Score: 199
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Deep
None or few
Somewhat poorly-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
24
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
Common
Very Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
10
Part 1 Total
95
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
High
High
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 Total
43
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
11
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Trees
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 Total
32
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 Total
2
Field 1 Total
50
Field 2 Total
39
Field 3 Total
53
Field 4 Total
30


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025