East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 159 - -
Team Name: Johnson County
Participant Name:
JAKE ANDERSON
Individual Rank: 10
Individual Total Score: 270
Team Rank: 3
Team Total Score: 270
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Shallow
Common
Poorly-drained
Many
Low
Very Steep
Severe
Depression
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
0
Part 1 Total
105
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
20
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VII
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
73
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 Total
42
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
50
Field 1 Total
97
Field 2 Total
71
Field 3 Total
64
Field 4 Total
38


AWS100: Wednesday, November 5, 2025