East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 72 - -
Team Name: UNAKA
Participant Name:
ANNA PAGE
Individual Rank: 14
Individual Total Score: 222
Team Rank: 5
Team Total Score: 222
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
Common
Well-drained
Common
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 Total
131
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
High
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
58
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 Total
25
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
8
Field 1 Total
58
Field 2 Total
61
Field 3 Total
55
Field 4 Total
48


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025