East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 14 - -
Team Name: Polk County
Participant Name:
KINDLE YEARWOOD
Individual Rank: 16
Individual Total Score: 202
Team Rank: 6
Team Total Score: 202
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Nearly level
None to slight
Depression
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
Many
Somewhat poorly-drained
Many
Low
Very Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
8
Part 1 Total
92
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 Total
48
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 Total
16
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
46
Field 1 Total
68
Field 2 Total
47
Field 3 Total
51
Field 4 Total
36


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025