East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 202 - -
Team Name: CUMBERLAND GAP
Participant Name:
MADISON MEDLEY
Individual Rank: 12
Individual Total Score: 264
Team Rank: 4
Team Total Score: 265
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
30
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Steep
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
11
Part 1 Total
119
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 Total
53
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 Total
44
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
48
Field 1 Total
93
Field 2 Total
66
Field 3 Total
64
Field 4 Total
41


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025