East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation Alternates
Overall

ID: 0 - -
Team Name: Tennessee Association FFA
Participant Name:
Individual Rank: 27
Individual Total Score: 108
Team Rank: 10
Team Total Score: 108
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Common
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1 Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
 
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
Common
Moderately well-drained
Common
Medium
Steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
17
Part 1 Total
69
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
0
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
3
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
3
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 Total
11
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 Total
20
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 Total
8
Field 1 Total
39
Field 2 Total
33
Field 3 Total
8
Field 4 Total
28


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025